Contents
Why is it bad to store images in database?
Storing images in a database table is not recommended. Storing the image data in the table requires the database server to process and traffic huge amounts of data that could be better spent on processing it is best suited to. A file server can process such image files much better.
Is it a bad design to store images as BLOBs in a database?
If your images are going to be small (say < 64k) and the storage engine of your db supports inline (in record) BLOBs, it improves performance further as no indirection is required (Locality of reference is achieved). Storing images may be a bad idea when you are dealing with small number of huge sized images.
How are large images stored in database?
The large images should be stored in something like AWS S3, HDFS, a Content Delivery Network (CDN), a web server, file server or whatever else would be great a serving up large static objects, in accordance with your use case and budget.
Is it good to store file in database?
Performance can be better than doing it in db. To justify this, If you store large files in db then it may slow down the performance because a simple query to retrieve the list of files or filename will also load the file data if you used Select * in your query. Migrating the data is an easy process here.
Is it better to store images in database or filesystem?
Images stored in the database do not require a different backup strategy. Images stored on filesystem do It is easier to control access to the images if they are in a database. Idle admins can access any folder on disk. It takes a really determined admin to go snooping in a database to extract the images
How big of an image can be stored in SQL Server?
if your pictures or document are typically over 1 MB in size, storing them in the filesystem is more efficient (and with SQL Server 2008’s FILESTREAM attribute, they’re still under transactional control and part of the database)
Why are Facebook images stored in a database?
Images stored on filesystem do It is easier to control access to the images if they are in a database. Idle admins can access any folder on disk. It takes a really determined admin to go snooping in a database to extract the images File store. Facebook engineers had a great talk about it.
When is it good idea to store images in dB?
If your images are going to be small (say < 64k) and the storage engine of your db supports inline (in record) BLOBs, it improves performance further as no indirection is required (Locality of reference is achieved). Storing images may be a bad idea when you are dealing with small number of huge sized images.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnNbizvb1uM