Is Meson better than CMake?

Is Meson better than CMake?

CMake vs Meson Both are fast build systems: Although Meson is written in Python, it generates a Ninja build project. It has a big advantage over Meson, it is mature and widely used in many projects, which means there are many examples and it will fulfill your C++ project building needs.

What is Meson Python?

Meson (/ˈmɛ. sɒn/) is a software tool for automating the building (compiling) of software. Meson is free and open-source software written in Python, under the Apache License 2.0.

What is Ninja and Meson?

Ninja is a small build system developed by Evan Martin, a Google employee. Instead, a “build generator” should be used to generate Ninja build files. Gyp, CMake, Meson, and gn are popular build management software tools which support creating build files for Ninja.

Is Ninja better than CMake?

For a decent-sized project – such as vpp – build performance is drastically better with (cmake, ninja). The cmake input language looks like an actual language, rather than a shell scripting scheme on steroids. Ninja doesn’t pretend to support manually-generated input files.

What does meson mean in English?

: any of a group of fundamental particles (such as the pion and kaon) made up of a quark and an antiquark that are subject to the strong force and have zero or an integer number of quantum units of spin. Other Words from meson Example Sentences Learn More About meson.

What is Meson build file?

A Meson file that builds an executable looks like this. project(‘simple’, ‘c’) executable(‘myexe’, ‘source.c’) All Meson build definitions begin with the project command. It specifies the name of the project and what programming languages it uses.

What is meant by a Meson?

Meson, any member of a family of subatomic particles composed of a quark and an antiquark. Mesons are sensitive to the strong force, the fundamental interaction that binds the components of the nucleus by governing the behaviour of their constituent quarks.

What is Ninja vs CMake?

The cmake input language looks like an actual language, rather than a shell scripting scheme on steroids. Ninja doesn’t pretend to support manually-generated input files. Think of it as a fast, dumb robot which eats mildly legible byte-code.

Which is better to use with CMake or meson?

CMake has been growing for 20 years, and many major projects have switched to CMake from legacy build systems. Meson can replace CMake or be used alongside CMake. CMake’s long lifetime leaves legacy CMake 2.x scripts with difficult to understand behavior and variable scope.

How to convert CMakeLists.txt to Meson build?

Meson most commonly uses the Ninja build backend, which we also recommend for CMake. Ninja can be downloaded or: A typical new Meson build starts like: By default, Ninja builds in parallel. Convert CMakeLists.txt to meson.build using tools/cmake2meson.py , which makes a first pass at recursively converting CMakeLists.txt to meson.build .

Where are variables stored in the CMake toolchain?

Meson will try to automatically guess most of the required CMake toolchain variables from existing entries in the cross and native files. These variables will be stored in an automatically generate CMake toolchain file in the build directory.

Which is the best build system for meson?

The Meson authors seem to agree here. The actual criterion for selecting a build system however should be tooling support and community spread. CMake easily wins here: After the introduction of the server mode it got native support by QtCreator, CLion, Android Studio (NDK) and even Microsofts Visual Studio.