Contents
Why did Google sue Oracle?
Google v Oracle: Supreme Court declares Google’s code copying fair. A decade-long battle over copied code in Google’s Android operating system has ended in the US Supreme Court. Oracle, another tech titan, had sued Google in 2010 for copyright infringement over what it said was copied computer code.
What exactly did Google copy from Java?
Because Google wanted programmers familiar with Java to be able to write software for Android, Google also copied roughly 11,500 lines of code from the “Java SE” program’s Application Programming Interface (API).
Is Java API copyrighted?
In May 2012, Judge William Alsup ruled that APIs are not subject to copyright because that would hamper innovation. Oracle appealed the ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals, which reversed Judge Alsup in May 2014, finding that the Java APIs are copyrightable.
Is it legal to use public API?
Generally, legally, an API is not considered to be “intended for public consumption” unless it’s actively documented as a public API, with specified terms of service. The fact that the public can reach the API does not make it public.
When did Oracle sue Google for copyright infringement?
Oracle, another tech titan, had sued Google in 2010 for copyright infringement over what it said was copied computer code. Android is now used in an estimated 70% of global smartphones, and damages could have run into the billions. But the Supreme Court let Google off the hook, overturning a lower court’s decision it had infringed copyright.
What is the case between Oracle and Google?
Oracle America, Inc. v. Google, Inc. is a current legal case within the United States related to the nature of computer code and copyright law. The dispute arose from Oracle ‘s copyright and patent claims on Google ‘s Android operating system.
Why did Oracle sue Google over Android APIs?
Oracle initiated the suit arguing that the APIs were copyrightable, seeking US$8.8 billion in damages from Google’s sales and licensing of the earlier infringing versions of Android.
Who was the Supreme Court justice in Google v Oracle?
Justice Stephen Breyer, in his written opinion, said that “to allow enforcement of Oracle’s copyright here would risk harm to the public”. So many programmers used and had deep knowledge of Oracle’s building blocks that such a move would turn computer code into “a lock limiting the future creativity of new programs”.