Contents
Can a criteria based sharing rule be tested?
The documentation states that “Criteria Based Sharing Rules cannot be tested” which I assume this refers to this. Frustratingly, I’m now having issues with the manual sharing record I’ve created as a workaround in my test – That’s not being recognised either…
How are test classes and sharing rules in apex?
For Contacts, we have a criteria based sharing rule that shares Contacts with a particular group of users if the contact is a particular record type I’ve written a test class that creates a Contact with the specified record type and runs as a user within the already mentioned group (they have the right role)
When do you need to define sharing rules?
Sharing rules work best when they’re defined for a particular group of users that you can determine or predict in advance, rather than a set of users that frequently changes. For example, in the Recruiting app, it’s important to share every position, candidate, job application, and review with every recruiter.
When to include cross reference object in sharing rule?
These dynamic values can be in form of formulas or result of calculation of multiple fields. Also, there should be provision of including cross-reference object’s field to form part of sharing rule on both left or right side of the criteria.
How to define sharing rules unit in Salesforce?
Choosing an object in this drop-down list allows you to focus in on the org-wide defaults and sharing rules for a single object at a time rather than looking at all of them in a long page—a useful thing if you’ve got a large org with multiple custom objects. In the Sharing Rules area, click New and give your rule a label.
What happens if the sharing rule does not behave?
This will cause validation of the Challenge to return the error: The sharing rule did not behave as expected. Sharing Settings > Organizational-Wide Defaults and set the Default Internal Access for the ‘Project’ object to Private and not Read Only.
Do you know how to do unit testing?
That would improve things over creating a project for each test, but only pain waits down that road (more than a decade ago, I used to test this way, before ubiquitous test runners existed). Adding a method and call for each test will prove laborious, and tracking the output will prove unwieldy.