Contents
How to avoid using select inside a loop?
Select statements are meant to traverse database tables, internal tables have commands, such as READ, MOVE, MODIFY, WRITE, etc. Help to improve this answer by adding a comment.
What’s the best way to avoid a for loop?
Other ways to avoid the for loop: 1 The apply functions: If you think you have to use a loop because you have to apply some sort of function to each… 2 If you have a lot of missing values and want to recode them all at once, or want to sum up the number of times you see a… More
When to use apply functions instead of for loops?
The apply functions: If you think you have to use a loop because you have to apply some sort of function to each observation in your data, think again! Use the apply () functions instead. For example:
How to avoid using select in Excel VBA-Stack Overflow?
There are many ways to refer to a single-cell range: You can use the shortcut to the Evaluate method, but this is less efficient and should generally be avoided in production code. All the above examples refer to cells on the active sheet. Unless you specifically want to work only with the active sheet, it is better to Dim a Worksheet variable too:
Is it OK to query inside a for loop?
Working fine, but heard that queries should not happen inside for loops. Any help, especially sample codes to make things clearer, will be greatly appreciated. You should query the records you need before your loop and cache them in a Map for retrieval later on.
Is there a way to avoid for loops in R?
My experience when starting out in R was trying to clean and recode data using for () loops, usually with a few if () statements in the loop as well, and finding the whole thing complicated and frustrating. In this post, I’ll go over how you can avoid for () loops for both improving the quality and speed of your programming, as well as your sanity.