Contents
10 tips to guide you toward effective peer code review
- Review fewer than 400 lines of code at a time.
- Take your time.
- Do not review for more than 60 minutes at a time.
- Set goals and capture metrics.
- Authors should annotate source code before the review.
- Use checklists.
- Establish a process for fixing defects found.
When should you do a code review?
When to review Code reviews should happen after automated checks (tests, style, other CI) have completed successfully, but before the code merges to the repository’s mainline branch. We generally don’t perform formal code review of aggregate changes since the last release.
What is code review in Devops?
Code reviews are not a new concept. They are often used as a manual gate-check for code changes before merging them to the trunk branch. This helps ensure quality and security by preventing developers from working in vacuums. It can also help ensure the entire team is aware of what’s going on in their project.
How to effectively manage your team’s workload?
Workload management tools provide real-time insight into the tasks your team has on their plate, so you can manage your team workload effectively and promote balance, not burnout.
What happens if you don’t distribute workload evenly?
There are real risks involved in not distributing the workload in an equitable way, says Julie Morgenstern, productivity expert and author of Never Check E-Mail in the Morning. “If you overwork your high performers, you will lose them because they start to resent the fact that they’re doing more,” she says.
Which is the best definition of workload management?
Workload management is the process of efficiently distributing and managing work across your team. When successfully done, workload management maximizes employee performance and helps melt away chaos, leaving you and your team feeling satisfied at the end of each day rather than overwhelmed.
Can a code review be used in a performance report?
Reports pulled from peer code reviews should never be used in performance reports. If personal metrics become a basis for compensation or promotion, developers will become hostile toward the process and naturally focus on improving personal metrics rather than writing better overall code. 9. Embrace the subconscious implications of peer review