Is the right to distribute software open source?

Is the right to distribute software open source?

The right for anyone to distribute software is one of the core components of Open Source. Because of this, you’ll find most open source licenses (like the AGPL someone else suggested) unsuitable. I suggest you drop that requirement.

Do you need a license to use open source software?

The right for anyone to distribute software is one of the core components of Open Source. Because of this, you’ll find most open source licenses (like the AGPL someone else suggested) unsuitable. I suggest you drop that requirement. In fact, I suggest you stop trying to craft a overly protective license.

What are the restrictions of a software license?

The conditions and restrictions of the license agreement vary from program to program and should be read carefully. In general, commercial software licenses stipulate that although one archival copy of the software can be made, the backup copy cannot be used except when the original package fails or is destroyed,

Is it legal to make unauthorized copies of software?

Software enables us to accomplish many different tasks with computers. Unfortunately, in order to get our work done quickly and conveniently, some people make and use unauthorized software copies. The purpose of this guideline is to provide a brief outline of what you legally can and cannot do with software.

Can you publish a source code without a license?

Once the work has other contributors (each a copyright holder), “nobody” starts including you. Even in the absence of a license file, you may grant some rights in cases where you publish your source code to a site that requires accepting terms of service.

What happens if you don’t have a license for your software?

An open source license allows reuse of your code while retaining copyright. If your goal is to completely opt-out of copyright restrictions, try a public domain dedication instead. If you find software that doesn’t have a license, that generally means you have no permission from the creators of the software to use, modify, or share the software.

Can you distribute your software under any terms?

As long it’s your software (being the author and owner of all rights), you can distribute it under whichever terms you see fit. And if it’s only that 1,2,3) sentence you roughly formulated. Then only distribute your software under your terms.

What does open source mean in software licensing?

Open Sourceonly means that the customer can take a look in the source. Generally spoken Open Source must not be free software at all. And especially in this question, I think that’s exactly what Marin asks for: A license that allows access to the source, even do some modifications to it, but derivates are not allowed to be redistributed.

Can you use a commerial license for open source?

Commerial License (of your choosing) for non-open source projects. If it will not be sold, just use AGPLv3 which will make it pretty much un-usable for any major corporations or profit driven that uses closed source. Highly active question. Earn 10 reputation (not counting the association bonus) in order to answer this question.