Contents
- 1 What if defect is not reproducible?
- 2 What should a QA tester know?
- 3 How will you test a pen?
- 4 What does it mean if data are reproducible but not accurate?
- 5 When does a defect need to be reproducible?
- 6 Which is more reproducible, observing an issue or reporting it?
- 7 Can a person reproduce a non reproducible bug?
What if defect is not reproducible?
If the bug is not reproducible, then the testing effort used in finding, analyzing and reporting that particular bug/defect is a total waste. For understanding and reproducing a bug, it is essential to have detailed and properly explained ‘Steps to Reproduce’, state and environment in which the bug occurred.
What should a QA tester know?
Five Must-Have Skills to Look for in a QA Tester
- Critical thinking. A company’s product must meet its customers’ requirements.
- Flexibility.
- Excellent communication skills.
- Quick to learn.
- Collaboration and social skills.
What is reproducible testing?
Reproducibility Testing refers to the process of validating that the reported research results can be obtained in an independent experiment.
How will you test a pen?
General Test Cases/Scenarios for all Types of Pen
- The grip of the pen: Verify if you are able to hold the pen comfortably.
- Writing: Verify if you are able to write smoothly.
- Verify that the pen is not making any sound while writing.
- Verify the ink flow.
- Verify the quality of the material used for the pen.
What does it mean if data are reproducible but not accurate?
What does it mean if data are reproducible but not accurate? The data can be produced over and over but are not close to the accepted value. The data can be produced over and over but are not close to the accepted value. The table shows results of an experiment that was replicated.
How do you know if your results are reproducible?
A measurement is reproducible if the investigation is repeated by another person, or by using different equipment or techniques, and the same results are obtained. N.B. “the same” results implies identical, but in reality “the same” means that random error will still be present in the results.
When does a defect need to be reproducible?
In the world of software testing, a defect once found should be consistently reproducible so the tester can report with conviction, a developer can fix with clarity and the QA team can close with confidence. However, this process sometimes comes with its own set of challenges.
Which is more reproducible, observing an issue or reporting it?
Observing an issue whole day and at the end of the day when you reported that defect, you find it’s no more reproducible. Observing an issue intermittently i.e., for example, suppose a new user is unable to add products to its cart. This happens 6 out of 10 times. Issue observed only when we restart the application.
Can You reproduce an issue more than once?
Reproduce the issues more than once to be sure of the occurrence of an issue. In such cases, you will be confident in your testing and will be able to reply the queries and concerns of developers.
Can a person reproduce a non reproducible bug?
You may reach a point in your testing career where you have found bug and may not able to reproduce it. There are many reasons for the same but most of the time you’re supposed to file such bugs. During the interview, this questions often comes and candidates find it harder to answer the same.