Contents
- 1 How does nested cross validation affect model selection?
- 2 How should feature selection and hyperparameter be done?
- 3 What is the role of inner and outer loops in cross validation?
- 4 How is inner cross validation used in model fitting?
- 5 Is there a double loop in nested cross validation?
- 6 How is cross validation used in data science?
- 7 How does supervised feature selection lead to overfitting?
How does nested cross validation affect model selection?
Model selection without nested cross-validation uses the same data to tune model parameters and evaluate model performance that may lead to an optimistically biased evaluation of the model. We get a poor estimation of errors in training or test data due to information leakage.
How should feature selection and hyperparameter be done?
When combining a global search method with a model that has tuning parameters, we recommend that, when possible, the feature set first be winnowed down using expert knowledge about the problem. Next, it is important to identify a reasonable range of tuning parameter values.
Why is nested CV used in hyperparameter optimization?
So, Nested-CV is used over non-nested CV because it helps to overcome the bias. Using nested-CV dramatically increases the number of model evaluations, and hence increasing the time complexity.
What’s the difference between nested and non nested CV?
Choosing the parameters that maximize non-nested CV biases the model to the dataset, yielding an overly-optimistic score. Model selection without nested CV uses the same data to tune model parameters and evaluate model performance. Information may thus “leak” into the model and overfit the data.
What is the role of inner and outer loops in cross validation?
The inner loop is responsible for model selection/hyperparameter tuning (similar to validation set), while the outer loop is for error estimation (test set). Divide the dataset into K K cross-validation folds at random. 2.4 For each fold l = 1, 2, …
How is inner cross validation used in model fitting?
Treat the inner cross validation as part of the model fitting procedure. That means that the fitting including the fitting of the hyper-parameters (this is where the inner cross validation hides) is just like any other model esitmation routine. The outer cross validation estimates the performance of this model fitting approach.
When to use cross validation and hyperparameter tuning?
Both Cross-Validation and Hyperpar a meter Optimization is an important aspect of a data science project. Cross-validation is used to evaluate the performance of a machine learning algorithm and Hyperparameter tuning is used to find the best set of hyperparameters for that machine learning algorithm.
When do you come up with cross validation?
It is natural to come up with cross-validation (CV) when the dataset is relatively small. The basic idea of cross-validation is to train a new model on a subset of data, and validate the trained model on the remaining data.
Is there a double loop in nested cross validation?
Yes, and that’s called nested cross-validation. In nested cross-validation, you have a double loop, an outer loop (that will serve for assessing the quality of the model), and an inner loop (that will serve for model/parameter selection).
How is cross validation used in data science?
Cross-Validation also referred to as out of sampling technique is an essential element of a data science project. It is a resampling procedure used to evaluate machine learning models and access how the model will perform for an independent test dataset.
Is there bias in feature selection in cross validation?
Edit: On implementing feature selection within cross validation on the data set detailed above (thanks to the answers below), I can confirm that selecting features prior to cross-validation in this data set introduced a significant bias. This bias/overfitting was greatest when doing so for a 3-class formulation, compared to as 2-class formulation.
How is feature selection biases the performance analysis?
If you perform feature selection on all of the data and then cross-validate, then the test data in each fold of the cross-validation procedure was also used to choose the features and this is what biases the performance analysis. Consider this example.
How does supervised feature selection lead to overfitting?
The suggestion is that any supervised feature selection (using correlation with class labels) performed outside of the model performance estimation using cross validation (or other model estimating method such as bootstrapping) may result in overfitting.