Contents
Can you use address instead of affiliation in REVTeX 4?
There used to be a “feature” in revtex-4, that if you used \\address instead of \\affiliation , then the whole thing behaves as expected. However, it seems that the latest version of revtex4-1, has patched this “bug”, and now even old documents that worked fine, have broken affiliations. e.g.:
Can a document be formatted in REVTeX 4.2?
Documents prepared under REVTeX 4 and REVTeX 4.1 should process correctly under REVTeX 4.2. However, the formatting of the pages and, if using BibTeX, the references may change. Under 4.2, articles typeset with the prb option will typeset cite commands differently and adjacent punctuation may need to be moved accordingly.
When does REVTeX 4.0a come out for Windows?
REVTeX 4.1s and REVTeX 4.0a are also patch releases to allow older documents to work with the new LaTeX kernel January 18, 2019: REVTeX 4.2 is now available incorporating the following changes:
Who are the authors of REVTeX 4.2?
REVTeX 4.2 was developed jointly by APS and AIPP (early versions of REVTeX 4 were developed by David Carlisle and Art Ogawa). Additional work was done by Patrick Daly to incorporate our suggested improvements into natbib 8.3 to address many new features concerning bibliographies. natbib 8.31a or later is required to run REVTeX 4.2.
Is there an old version of REVTeX in Debian?
The Ubuntu/Debian repositories have an old version of revtex that exhibit this bug. Until the repos are updated, there is a .deb file available in the bug report that installs the new version of revtex I’m Trying to get multiple affiliations for the author list when using revtex-4.1
Is there a bug in revtex4-1.1?
However, it seems that the latest version of revtex4-1, has patched this “bug”, and now even old documents that worked fine, have broken affiliations. e.g.: Ignore the style differences (the first one was typeset by arxiv with a prl instead of an api style).The latex behind the two is identical.
I’m Trying to get multiple affiliations for the author list when using revtex-4.1 The default behavior is to group the authors together according to affiliation as so: However, this requires you to group authors together in an unnatural way, and usually in a way that conflicts with authorship politics.
What happens when you switch to superscriptaddress mode?
Even if you switch to superscriptaddress mode, the requirement on grouping still remains. For example, If I want to have two authors share an affiliation, but have one of the authors have a second affiliation, the whole thing ends up ignoring the first affiliation of the second author: e.g.