What will cause an editor to reject a paper without a review?

What will cause an editor to reject a paper without a review?

There could be many reasons for rejection without review:

• Content of the article is not within the scope of the journal.
• Non-conformity with journal style, format, or guidelines.
• Duplication or large overlap with existing work or apparent plagiarism.

Do papers ever get accepted without revisions?

Never. Well, virtually never. In my experience, even the most esteemed and prolific authors get there papers sent back for revisions at least once, although usually for “token” and superficial changes. I think it’s just accepted as “good form” in journal publishing etiquette.

How do you politely decline a reviewer comment?

But if you answer “no,” then how can you decline to address the comment? The basic structure is simple, and based on respect: Acknowledge the reviewer’s suggestion. Then state why you’re not going to make the suggested change.

Why do journal editors and reviewers reject papers?

A paper may be rejected because of problems with its presentation. If an author has been careless in writing/presenting a paper, the journal editor may suspect that the author has also been careless in conducting the research on which the paper is based.

Is Desk rejection bad?

So for many academics a desk-reject causes extreme disappointment, a feeling that can easily change to desperation if this same outcome is repeated over and over again.

Do minor revisions go back to reviewers?

6 Answers. Minor revision usually implies that the reviewers (and the editor) think that authors can correct the paper in a way that will address all of the concerns, and the reviewers not need to see the paper again before publication.

How do I disagree with a reviewer comment?

Be polite, give proper argument to explain why you differ with reviewer comment, and let the editor decide. Be polite and make strong arguments.

What happens if 2 reviewers say your paper is reject?

If 2 reviewers say the paper is reject, then either you chose the wrong journal (and wrong audience, reviewers ARE members of your audience as well), or your paper is really not worth of publication.

Why was my article rejected by Elsevier connect?

His advice to authors: “By avoiding these pitfalls, you will save reviewers, editors and staff time and frustration, and ensure that your work is judged by its scientific merit, not mistakes.” 1. It fails the technical screening. Before they even go to the editor-in-chief, articles are checked for technical elements.

What should I do if two peer reviewers don’t understand my paper?

The authors should consider rewriting the abstract and introduction. If two peer reviewers didn’t understand the paper, the paper may just need a savage reworking. The authors may also wish to try working with a freelance development editor.

What should you do when you get a negative review?

When you get negative reviews, it is natural and human to assume the reviewers are idiots and too blind to see the brilliance of the work sitting before them. Well, that’s fine. Take a moment to curse the reviewers, and get it out of your system. Then calm down, and think more rationally.