How do you handle conflicting reviewer comments?

How do you handle conflicting reviewer comments?

How to Deal with Conflicting Reviewer Comments

1. The role of the editor is key. The first thing to note is that divergent reviews should present a challenge to the editor rather than the author.
2. Consider the value of each review.
3. Seek guidance when necessary.
4. As author, you have the final say.
5. Author takeaways.

How do you thank a reviewer for comments?

We would like to thank the reviewers for their thoughtful comments and efforts towards improving our manuscript. In the following, we highlight general concerns of reviewers that were common and our effort to address these concerns. We then address comments specific to each reviewer below.

How do you reply after reviewing a document?

Response: Agree. I/We have, accordingly, done/revised/changed/modified…..to emphasize this point. [Discuss the changes made, providing the necessary explanation/clarification. Mention exactly where in the revised manuscript this change can be found – page number, paragraph, and line.]

How do I deal with reviewer 2?

So, here’s a bit of practical and philosophical advice to help you work through a tough peer review.

1. Go ahead and vent—but be careful about where and how you do so.
2. Focus on problems, not solutions.
3. Clarify your vision.
4. Talk to your editor.

How do I write a message to the reviewer?

DO this:

1. Recognize that the reviewers are volunteers and used their time to work hard on your paper.
2. Respond to every single comment.
3. For your convenience and the reviewers, it helps to number each comment.
4. Keep your responses short, direct, and to the point.
5. Always accept responsibility.

How do I write a message to reviewer?

Do authors usually know who their reviewers are?

There is no one agreed definition of open peer review. Typically, it will mean that the reviewers know you are the author and also that their identity will be revealed to you at some point during the review or publication process. Find out more about open peer review.

What is a reviewer 2?

Reviewer 2 symbolizes the peer reviewer who is rude, vague, smug, committed to pet issues, theories, and methodologies, and unwilling to treat the authors as peers. Reviews exemplifying such characteristics are hard to take and can have a number of negative consequences for the authors, the journal, and the field.

What’s the best way to respond to a bad review?

Their argument is that some bad reviewers are simply “online bullies.” And at the end of the day, there’s nothing you can do to make the situation better. That’s a fair point in some extreme cases, but we recommend a different approach: hold your head up high and respond always.

How to respond to a negative review on a website?

Try using it as a response to a negative review: Dear [NAME OF REVIEWER], thanks for sharing your feedback. We’re sorry your experience didn’t match your expectations. It was an uncommon instance and we’ll do better in the future.

Is it good to get comments from peer reviewers?

Comments from peer reviewers, more often than not, offer an excellent opportunity to improve the quality of your manuscript. Addressing them adequately may increase the chances of acceptance, if not in that journal, elsewhere at least.

When to include performance comments in a rating?

If there have been counseling sessions, letters of commendation or reprimand, or unofficial performance reviews within the rating period, the supervisor should keep documentation on file and site these occurrences in the performance comments on the official rating. Below are examples of comments that would support individual ratings.