Contents
What should I focus on code review?
Code reviews often just focus on mistakes, but they should offer encouragement and appreciation for good practices, as well. It’s sometimes even more valuable, in terms of mentoring, to tell a developer what they did right than to tell them what they did wrong.
What is the point of code review?
Code review helps give a fresh set of eyes to identify bugs and simple coding errors before your product gets to the next step, making the process for getting the software to the customer more efficient. Simply reviewing someone’s code and identifying errors is great.
What does Google use for code review?
Now Google uses a re-written version of their own created code review tool Mondrian called Critique. It is a proprietary tool, with lesser knowledge of the outer world but runs on the same functioning as Mondrian. Diffs are centered around ChangeLists (CL). All reviews are done under Mondrian.
What should be the focus of a code review?
The focus and goal of such a code review are to find problems with the code and to ensure the code is of high-quality. Even though code reviews provide a much broader set of benefits, such as knowledge dissemination, learning and mentoring, it is important to keep those two main goals in mind.
How many lines of code should you review at a time?
10 tips to guide you toward effective peer code review. 1. Review fewer than 400 lines of code at a time. A SmartBear study of a Cisco Systems programming teamrevealed that developers should review no more than 200 to 400 lines of code (LOC) at a time. The brain can only effectively process so much information at a time; beyond 400 LOC,
What can be done to improve code quality?
Done incorrectly, code review can be irritating, excessively time consuming, and have little or no impact on code quality. But, if done correctly, it can improve code quality and reduce the time spent delivering features. It also helps find tricky bugs and speeds up knowledge sharing in the team.
Can a code review be used in a performance report?
Reports pulled from peer code reviews should never be used in performance reports. If personal metrics become a basis for compensation or promotion, developers will become hostile toward the process and naturally focus on improving personal metrics rather than writing better overall code. 9. Embrace the subconscious implications of peer review