How to replicate merge in SQL Server management studio?
Once the publication is created, Navigate to the Local Publications under the replication folder in SQL Server Management Studio. Right click on the publication you created and click on Properties -> Subscription Options and make sure replicate schema changes is enabled. Now add table “schema_test” to the merge publication created earlier.
What are the triggers for SQL server replication?
For each table added to merge replication three triggers one for insert, one for update and one for delete were created on the table. Also, few procedures, views and conflict table were created for each table added to merge publication. You can view them using table dependencies or you can query them using article id.
Where is replication folder in SQL Server management studio?
Once the publication is created, Navigate to the Local Publications under the replication folder in SQL Server Management Studio. Right click on the publication you created and click on Properties -> Subscription Options and make sure replicate schema changes is enabled.
How long does replication take in SQL Server?
Launch the SQL Server replication monitor and we can see it took 13 seconds to sync these changes to subscriber. This may vary if your table structure is complex. Sync time would go high if you have lot of tables involved merge replication and adding/dropping columns using multiple alter table statements more tables.
Why does replication take one second to sync?
Now it took one second to add 10 new columns to the table “schema_test” because the SQL Server Replication internal objects were modified only once instead of 10 times. Launch the SQL Server replication monitor and check the sync timings. It took around four seconds to sync the schema changes to subscriber.
Why is SQL server merge so slow in MySQL?
The same functionality in MYSql is 10 seconds (MySQL uses on duplicate key update). As SQL Server then locks my database table for the duration of the MERGE (23mins!) and my 90k rows is a relatively small test file, this performance is extremely undesirable. This must be something I have not optimised.