Contents
Are GUIDs slow?
The use of a GUID to locate a record versus an integer is slightly slower. Unless you have a very high throughput application, these are probably not important considerations. One key point is that the GUID column should not be clustered. This is very important because GUIDs are random, but primary keys are ordered.
Why not to use GUID as primary key?
If you do not use sequential guids, and your primary key is clustered (the SQL Server defaul) then all your data inserts will be randomly scattered throughout the table, leading to massive fragmentation of your data. That is assuming that the data would normally be inserted in some sort of order, such as chronological.
Why use GUID instead of int?
In such case I would use GUID, because it guaranties that 2 documents created in different parts of distributed system wouldn’t have same Id. An INT is certainly much easier to read when debugging, and much smaller. I would, however, use a GUID or similar as a license key for a product.
Should GUID be primary key?
GUIDs may seem to be a natural choice for your primary key – and if you really must, you could probably argue to use it for the PRIMARY KEY of the table. What I’d strongly recommend not to do is use the GUID column as the clustering key, which SQL Server does by default, unless you specifically tell it not to.
What is Newsequentialid?
You can use NEWSEQUENTIALID to generate GUIDs to reduce page splits and random IO at the leaf level of indexes. Each GUID generated by using NEWSEQUENTIALID is unique on that computer. GUIDs generated by using NEWSEQUENTIALID are unique across multiple computers only if the source computer has a network card.
When should you use GUID?
A GUID is a “Globally Unique IDentifier”. You use it anywhere that you need an identifier that guaranteed to be different than every other. GUIDs are generally used when you will be defining an ID that must be different from an ID that someone else (outside of your control) will be defining.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of Guid?
In other words: There may be good reasons to add GUID columns to tables, but please don’t fall for the temptation to make that lower your ambitions for consistency within the real (==non-GUID) information. The main advantages are that you can create unique id’s without connecting to the database.
Which is better between Guid and UUID databases?
With sequential IDs if the most-recent data is needed the most, the hot index pages would require less RAM. UUID values are unique between tables and databases. Thats why it can be merge rows between two databases or distributed databases. UUID is more safer to pass through url than integer type data.
Are there any issues with using a GUID as a primary key?
One other small issue to consider with using GUIDS as primary keys if you are also using that column as a clustered index (a relatively common practice). You are going to take a hit on insert because of the nature of a guid not begin sequential in anyway, thus their will be page splits, etc when you insert.
What happens when you add a random UUID to a GUID?
Now, a sequential integer ID would cause the inserts to occur just one side of the tree, leaving most of the leaf nodes untouched. Adding random UUIDs will cause the insertions to split leaf nodes all over the index.