Can a GPL library be distributed for commercial use?

Can a GPL library be distributed for commercial use?

You can distribute your application using a GPL library commercially, but you must also provide the source code. GPL v3 tries to close some loopholes in GPL v2.

Can I use GPL v3 licensed software in a commercial application?

Can I use GPL v3 licensed software in a commercial application that is accessed through web APIs? A product that I’m developing uses a component that is licensed under GPL v3. I do not want to redistribute the software: I plan to have a paid service where users can access my software through HTTP APIs.

Do you have to make GPL source available?

(b) If you do distribute YOUR APPLICATION, and you used something GPL as part of your application (even if only linking at run-time to a library) – and even if you do not charge money – and even if you do not change that GPL s/w in any way – then you MUST make the source of YOUR APPLICATION available. Making source available does not mean download.

Can a GPL program violate a proprietary license?

GPL program is infecting and infected the parent and the child non GPL process (proprietary and even other open source license) from the perspective of law. Infecting means derived program violate GPL, infected means GPL program violate its own license.

When is a GPL license incompatible with a module?

If license for a module Q has a requirement that’s incompatible with the GPL, but the requirement applies only when Q is distributed by itself, not when Q is included in a larger program, does that make the license GPL-compatible? Can I combine or link Q with a GPL-covered program?

Can a piece of software obtained under the GNU GPL be modified?

If I use a piece of software that has been obtained under the GNU GPL, am I allowed to modify the original code into a new program, then distribute and sell that new program commercially? How does the LGPL work with Java? Could you give me step by step instructions on how to apply the GPL to my program?

When does your software need to be covered by the GPL?

If you release/distribute software containing GPL’d components (such as statically linked libraries), your software must be covered by the GPL. (This is the impression given for version 2; version 3 may be different.)

Can a GPL license be used on a website?

Only a lawyer can give you proper legal advice. This very strongly seems to disagree if you are using it on a website, rather than re-distributing an executable: You may copy, distribute and modify the software as long as you track changes/dates of in source files and keep modifications under GPL.

How does GPLv3 apply to offer for source?

The terms related to the offer for source are quite different if you distribute under GPLv3. Under v3, you may make source available only over a network server, as long as it is available to the general public and remains active for three years from the last distribution of your product or related spare part.

Can a company run a modified version of a GPL ed program?

A company is running a modified version of a GPL’ed program on a web site. Does the GPL say they must release their modified sources? (#UnreleasedMods) The GPL permits anyone to make a modified version and use it without ever distributing it to others. What this company is doing is a special case of that.

Can a GPL program run on anyone else’s computer?

That code runs on your computer, nobody else’s. Since the GPL code doesn’t execute on anyone else’s machine, they cannot demand to see the source for the running program, even if it was modified.

Can a GPL tool be made open source?

Unless someone in the comments disagrees, I’d like to point out that if you need to use a bit of GPL code at your devops / build layer, you can make that tool a separate application which CAN, potentially, be made open source w/o giving away the product your other-named tool builds. If you use GPL code at runtime, you gotta give out the source.

Can a closed source application be open source?

If I create a closed source application which uses some GPL licensed libraries but don’t actually distribute the software, only its output, can I keep the software closed sourced? Specifically, I am talking about a biological data analysis pipeline. Internally, our software will be using some GPL libraries to generate its output.

Can you distribute unmodified binaries under the GPL?

If you’re distributing (unmodified) binaries along with a product you ship, then you’re required to distribute the source with them, or provide a way for people to request the sources. This is not a situation where you can ignore the GPL, but it’s not going to be a real problem for you.

Do you need to distribute source code under GPLv2?

The GPLv2 only requires you to provide source code (and unencumbered redistribution rights) to those whom you give the software. If the software is only on your computer, you don’t need to distribute code, because you’re not distributing binaries.

Can you sell a modified version of the GPL?

You are allowed to sell copies of the modified program commercially, but only under the terms of the GNU GPL. Thus, for instance, you must make the source code available to the users of the program as described in the GPL, and they must be allowed to redistribute and modify it as described in the GPL.

Which is an example of software under the GPL license?

Examples of software commonly used under the GPL are the Linux kernel and the rest of the GNU/Linux operating system, including the GCC compiler, Git, FileZilla and WordPress, just to name a few. The FireFox browser uses a similar copyleft license. Almost all corporate environments make use of GPL licensed software.

Can a GPL licence be used in a corporate environment?

We are not selling the software, but rather use it for analysis. Would anyone be able to shed some light on the subject to help clear things up? Software licensed with any GNU license can be used and even modified everywhere, including in a corporate environment, without any restrictions.

Do you have to release modified version of GPL?

A company is running a modified version of a GPLed program on a web site. Does the GPL say they must release their modified sources? A company is running a modified version of a program licensed under the GNU Affero GPL (AGPL) on a web site.

Can you use an open source library with a LGPL license?

Otherwise you have likely intertwingled the library and main application code. The LGPL license allows an application that references the binaries to remain closed-source. Also, there’s nothing preventing you from selling an open source app on the Microsoft App Marketplace.

How can I use LGPL in commercial software?

All you have to do is ensure that users can obtain any modifications you make (as stated by LGPL) and make their own modifications (by recompiling the library and replacing the library in your app). Not always. Many platforms have restrictions or signatures for security reasons these days.

Can you use GPL and LGPL at the same time?

Some library authors therefore provide licenses that are both GPL or LGPL and also paid private licenses. Therefore, I can get the library, fully integrate it and test it (and even modify it) before deciding, yes, this works, and then pay for a license to distribute that isn’t GPL or LGPL.

Do you have to license GPLv3 source code?

If you use components that are licensed under GPLv3, then you are required to license the complete application the contains the GPL components under the GPL as well. However, this is not all bad news, because the GPL only requires that you distribute the source code only to those persons that you distribute the binary to.

Is there such a thing as a freemium library?

The Android Freemium Library is a library that aims to help you put up a freemium model within your android application. What I mean by Freemium Business Model is to propose users to use features from your apps for free, but will have to pay to use advanced features.

Can a MIT library be shared under the GPL?

This means that the MIT portions can be shared under that license, but if the whole project is distributed, it must be under GPL. No. GPL is copyleft, meaning you have to distrubute any derivative works of the original also under the GPL.

Can a company stop you from distributing code under the GPL?

A company that is overly concerned with the potential effects of distributing GPL-licensed code might attempt to prohibit its developers from adding any such code to a container image that it plans to distribute. Insofar as the aim is to avoid distributing code under the GPL, this is a dubious strategy.

What does GPL stand for in the GNU license?

“GPL” stands for “General Public License”. The most widespread such license is the GNU General Public License, or GNU GPL for short. This can be further shortened to “GPL”, when it is understood that the GNU GPL is the one intended.

Why are GPL requirements important to Software Freedom?

These requirements are carefully designed to uphold certain values and standards of the software freedom community. While the GPL’s requirements may appear initially counter-intuitive to those more familiar with proprietary software licenses, by comparison its terms are in fact clear and favorable to licensees.