Contents
- 1 How a queue can be implemented using singly linked list?
- 2 Is queue a singly linked list?
- 3 When we implement queue by using a linked list?
- 4 When queue is implemented using linked list the insertion operation is performed at?
- 5 Which of the following is correct if queue is implemented using double linked list?
How a queue can be implemented using singly linked list?
A queue can be easily implemented using a linked list. In singly linked list implementation, enqueuing happens at the tail of the list, and the dequeuing of items happens at the head of the list. We need to maintain a pointer to the last node to keep O(1) efficiency for insertion.
Is queue a singly linked list?
Queue is a collection of one or more elements arranged in memory in a contiguous fashion. A linked list is a collection of one or more elements arranged in memory in a dis-contiguous fashion. In Queue, only one and single type of information is stored because static Queue implementation is through Array.
How queue can be implemented using singly circular linked list using one pointer?
A queue is implemented using a circular list. If only one pointer is given to which node a pointer p should point such that enqueue and dequeue operation could be performed in o(1).
When we implement queue by using a linked list?
One of the alternative of array implementation is linked list implementation of queue. The storage requirement of linked representation of a queue with n elements is o(n) while the time requirement for operations is o(1). In a linked queue, each node of the queue consists of two parts i.e. data part and the link part.
When queue is implemented using linked list the insertion operation is performed at?
2. In linked list implementation of a queue, where does a new element be inserted? Explanation: Since queue follows FIFO so new element inserted at last.
What makes implementing a queue with a linked list potentially easier than implementing a queue with a typical array?
What makes implementing a queue with a Linked List potentially easier than implementing a queue with a typical array? There’s no need to explicitly shift the elements of a LinkedList to the front, as there would be in an array.
Which of the following is correct if queue is implemented using double linked list?
If Queue is implemented using Linked list then it can be done in either of the ways. Explanation: The answer is b, i.e., Underflow. Before deleting an element from the Queue, we first need to check whether the Queue is empty or not.