Contents
How do you finish a hotfix branch?
When the “Gitflow hotfix finish” command is called, the commit is merged into both master and develop branches and then deleted. The hotfix branch no longer exists, and the only reminder it was ever here is the tag left on the master branch.
Can we have multiple develop branch in git?
Git Flow Branching Model Alongside the main branch lives the development branch. Once the code is tested, it can be merged into the main branch. Depending on your branching strategy, you can have multiple types of supporting branches like feature branches, hotfixes, and release branches.
Should Release branch be deleted?
Correct, if you don’t merge release to develop then you leave yourself open to regressions. Even if the release branch gets deleted, you will still have a history of the commits that made it onto master branch, so you would still be able to recover them, by cherry picking out the commits as required.
Is it safe to delete branch after merge?
4 Answers. There’s no problem in deleting branches that have been merged in. All the commits are still available in the history, and even in the GitHub interface, they will still show up (see, e.g., this PR which refers to a fork that I’ve deleted after the PR got accepted).
Does deleting a branch delete commits?
In Git, branches are just pointers (references) to commits in a directed acyclic graph (DAG) of commits. This means that deleting a branch removes only references to commits, which might make some commits in the DAG unreachable, thus invisible.
How should you handle a hotfix in Git flow?
I guess you could put the release tag on the hotfix branch, but that would create a permanent branch beside the master that would contain a release tag. Is that the right way? It seems that there is a concept of a “support” branch in git flow. This is used to add a hotfix to an earlier release.
How should you handle a branch following Git-flow?
If you try to follow the git-flow branching model, documented here and with tools here, how should you handle this situation: You have made a 1.0 release and a 2.0 release. Then you need to make a hotfix for 1.0.
When to put a release tag on a hotfix branch?
Normally you would merge to master and put a 1.1 release tag there. But you can’t merge 1.1 to a point after 2.0 on master. I guess you could put the release tag on the hotfix branch, but that would create a permanent branch beside the master that would contain a release tag.
When do you not need a hotfix branch?
If you have to maintain multiple production versions, one branch to track production is not enough. A solution is not to use master to track production. Instead, use branches like release1, release2, etc. In this approach, you may not even need a hotfix branch.