Contents
How to cover catch blocks in Test class?
So, in test class I can write two TestMethods such that catch block also executes by passing variables b=0. Let Me know if that helps you. Here how do I cover the catch block?
How to cover catch block in apex Test class in Salesforce?
Try-Catch block we are using for handling the Exception which generated by our Apex Code. Please check the below apex test code which will cover the try-catch block in your apex class. Note: This code is written only to cover catch Block. Loading… Be the first to like this.
How to test apex class with try catch?
Boolean exceptionCaught = false; try { testUnit.myMethod (); }catch (MyClass.MyException e) { // Only set our variable if we encounter the exception we expected // This allows the assertion below to be useful exceptionCaught = true; } System.assert (exceptionCaught, ‘Expected exception was not caught’); }
Is there an exception for try catch block?
Et voila, one guaranteed exception, able to be crafted to your liking. Quick and easy to implement, hard to accidentally cause issues when it’s being run for real, minimally invasive.
When to use excpetion instead of catch block?
You just need to call method in which above try block is there. Excpetion part will only cover when any exception will come. In Above Code look like no excpetion will come. It is not covering catch block of source code. That is why exception part is covering.
Is there a way to test code coverage both ways?
You can test your code both ways, once with the flag set, the other with the flag cleared. This will help you cover 100% code. However, this sort of technique isn’t recommended for casual optimization of code coverage, because it introduces test behavior in your production code.
How to cover catch block in JUnit testing?
You can use Mockito.spy on your requestMap, and mock case, when exception should be thrown. Then (as pointed by jannis) you can use AssertJ’s fluent API to verify there’s no exception thrown (you are muting it in catch clause), e.g