Contents
- 1 Is equal contribution the same as first author?
- 2 How do you indicate CO-first authors?
- 3 What is equal contribution status?
- 4 How do you indicate equal authorship?
- 5 Are co first authors listed alphabetically?
- 6 How is being first author related to size of contribution?
- 7 How to cite paper with two co-first authors?
Shared co-first authorship is defined as two or more authors who have worked together on a publication and contributed equally [8]. This equal contribution is often indicated in the fine print of a published paper or in an investigator’s curriculum vitae [9].
Traditionally, co-first authors are indicated by an asterisk and the order of the individuals is the decision of the PI. Once the paper is published, it appears in print as follows: co-Author 1*, co-Author 2*, Author 3, and Author 4.
How many co First authors can you have?
Only one of the authors will appear as first author, in any publication. Every other entry is a secondary entry. However, corresponding authors could be as many as three depending on the multi-disciplinary nature of the article.
What is equal contribution status?
The equal contributions footnote specifies if two or more authors contributed to the manuscript equally. It would appear under the author byline on the PDF. If only some of the authors have the equal contribution designation, the footnote will say, “These authors contributed equally”.
How do you cite a paper with multiple first authors?
To avoid ambiguity, when the in-text citations of multiple works with three or more authors shorten to the same form, write out as many names as needed to distinguish the references, and abbreviate the rest of the names to “et al.” in every citation. This guidance is the same as in the 6th edition.
Is there a consensus that co-first authors should be in alphabetical order and is the editor likely to point this out? No, “A” has no right to require alphabetical ordering.
It is often related to size of contribution. In particular, being first author is often related to making the greatest contribution. But disciplines vary substantially in the meaning of author order.
Where do you put relative contribution of authors?
An appropriate place to mention relative contribution of authors is in the author note in a paper. More generally, there are a lot of variants on the “co-first-author” scenario. In some cases, authors will note equal contribution or that author order was determined by a coin toss.
For example, in some cases the first and second author will have contributed equally. It seems more sensible to say that both authors contributed equally than to say that they were both “first authors”, because at the end of the day, a reference has to have a canonical order to the authors.