Contents
Is git squash a good practice?
Squash = Yes. For a simple project with no sharing between devs required and regular releases, then squashing features seems like a good idea if you: Keep detailed commit messages when you squash. But, if you delete them git will keep your commits in the reflog for 30 days by default.
What does squash do in git?
What does it mean to squash commits in Git? Squashing is a way to rewrite your commit history; this action helps to clean up and simplify your commit history before sharing your work with team members. Squashing a commit in Git means that you are taking the changes from one commit and adding them to the Parent Commit.
Why would you want to squash commits?
Commit squashing has the benefit of keeping your git history tidy and easier to digest than the alternative created by merge commits. While merge commits retain commits like “oops missed a spot” and “maybe fix that test? [round 2]”, squashing retains the changes but omits the individual commits from history.
Is git squash Safe?
If you really want to have multiple commits for a feature, at least squash down so that each commit builds and passes tests. While this workflow can be dangerous if you don’t have an understanding of what you are doing, after minimal education on the matter, this process is extremely safe.
What is the difference between squash and merge?
What is squash merge? A squash merge is a merge option in Git that will produce a merge commit with only one parent. The files are merged exactly as they would be in a normal merge, but the commit metadata is changed to show only one of the parent commits.
What is Git squash commit?
To “squash” in Git means to combine multiple commits into one. You can do this at any point in time (by using Git’s “Interactive Rebase” feature), though it is most often done when merging branches. Instead, squashing is rather an option when performing other Git commands like interactive rebase or merge.
Does Git Squash create a new commit?
change the “commands” to squash for all the commits apart from the first one, and then close your editor. In Git, commits are never edited. They can be pruned, made not reachable, cloned but not changed. When you rebase, you are actually creating new commits.
Should I squash commits or not?
As a general rule, when merging a pull request from a feature branch with a messy commit history, you should squash your commits. There are exceptions, but in most cases, squashing results in a cleaner Git history that’s easier for the team to read.
What happens when you squash commits?
Squashing a commit means, from an idiomatic point of view, to move the changes introduced in said commit into its parent so that you end up with one commit instead of two (or more). If you repeat this process multiple times, you can reduce n commit to a single one.