Contents
Is Haskell good for beginners?
If you check out other SO questions, you’ll see that Haskell is pretty much never mentioned as a good choice for a beginner. However, if you are a mathematician, or already know enough about programming to understand the value of functional programming, I think Haskell is a fine choice.
What is Haskell best used for?
Haskell is a perfect choice for high-load concurrent applications, such as web backends. Maintainability. Haskell encourages using the type system to model the business domain and making the assumptions explicit. As a result, refactoring the code and adapting it to changing requirements is much easier.
Is Haskell a Lisp?
They’re both functional programming languages and Lisp influenced Haskell, but Haskell is not a Lisp derivative.
Which is better for functional programming scheme or Haskell?
If you’re interested in the more advanced concepts in functional programming, then go with Haskell. There’s a proper type system and a strict prohibition against mutation. Still, Haskell is not for the faint-of-heart. If you just want an introduction to functional design, go with Scheme. The syntax is much easier to learn and read.
Which is the best way to learn Haskell?
Learn You a Haskell has a very traditional approach to teaching a specific language. The Little Schemer is specific to Scheme, obviously, but is much more concerned with teaching the fundamentals of functional programming, not the language of Scheme. I definitely recommend starting with The Little Schemer. It’s less practical, but more fundamental.
Is there static typing in scheme or Haskell?
Scheme doesn’t have static typing (there is Typed Racket, but it’s not for the scheme beginners), and Haskell has too much other stuff (monads, lazy evaluation…) that, while interesting, may divert attention from the important basis.
Which is better a Scheme, ML or Haskell?
Between a Scheme, a ML and a Haskell, I would choose the ML because I think it’s the most relevant to this definition.