Contents
Is merging or rebasing better?
If you want to see the history completely same as it happened, you should use merge. Merge preserves history whereas rebase rewrites it . Rebasing is better to streamline a complex history, you are able to change the commit history by interactive rebase.
Can I merge same branch twice?
Merging a branch multiple times into another works fine if there were changes to merge. Actually yes you totally can, when you merge again it will bring over any commits that don’t exist on production.
Why is it a pull request and not a merge request?
“. . . GitHub and Bitbucket choose the name “pull request” because the first manual action is to pull the feature branch. Tools such as GitLab and others choose the name “merge request” because the final action is to merge the feature branch.”
What is the difference between merge and pull request?
6 Answers. GitLab’s “merge request” feature is equivalent to GitHub’s “pull request” feature. Both are means of pulling changes from another branch or fork into your branch and merging the changes with your existing code. They are useful tools for code review and change management.
Why does Git merge development say Master has been merged?
So that seems to show that master was not actually merged into development — shouldn’t git merge development succeed if git merge master was already executed? To cause more confusion, git branch –merged development says that master has been merged into development. I guess that is consistent with git merge master ….
Why does it take so much time to merge a branch?
There will be conflicts anyhow, so time needs to be spent on fixing those. The longer a branch lives, the more it is able to diverge from the main branch and the messier and more complicated the resulting merge will be when it’s finally finished.
How often should I merge master into B?
Ten small conflicts are easier to resolve than 1 massive conflict, and may actually prevent developers from duplicating or wasting effort. Given that, you should merge master into A and B regularly; once a day is a pretty common recommendation, though if you have a lot of activity on your branches you may wish to merge multiple times a day.
What’s the difference between git show and Git merge?
The git show command does something different and better. It runs two git diff s, one for I -vs- J and one for G -vs- J. It then tries to combine the two diffs, showing you only what changed in both. That is, where J is different from I but not in a particularly interesting way, Git suppresses the difference.