Should I use RSA-2048?

Should I use RSA-2048?

Advisories recommend 2048 for now. Security experts are projecting that 2048 bits will be sufficient for commercial use until around the year 2030. The main downside to using a large cert, such as 3072 or 4096, is that the algorithm is slightly slower (still fractions of a second, though).

Is 4096 bit RSA secure?

Researchers from Tel Aviv University and the Weizmann Institute of Science discovered that they could steal even the largest, most secure RSA 4,096-bit encryption keys simply by listening to a laptop as it decrypts data.

Is 2048 bit encryption secure?

The advantage of 2048-bit encryption is increased strength. By strength we mean its ability to resist brute force attacks. While it’s true that the certificate is 2,048 bits in length, this isn’t the size of the actual keys used. They are typically 128 bits or 256 bits.

What’s the difference between RSA 2048 and RSA 4096?

Key lengths for these kinds of algorithms are considerably smaller. According to NIST, 112 and 128 bits of security, (equivalent to RSA-2048 and RSA-4096) correspond to 255-bit and 383-bit long ECC keys (worst case, even less on some specific curves). So why are we not using this everywhere?

Which is better the 2048 key or the 4096 key?

Just imagine where technology was fifteen years ago! While it is true that a longer key provides better security, we have shown that by doubling the length of the key from 2048 to 4096, the increase in bits of security is only 18, a mere 16%.

When to start using 4096 bit RSA keys?

Theoretically, RSA keys that are 2048 bits long should be good until 2030. If so, isn’t it a bit early to start using the 4096-bit keys that have become increasingly available in encryption-enabled applications?

Which is better 2048 or 3072 encryption keys?

Advisories recommend 2048 for now. Security experts are projecting that 2048 bits will be sufficient for commercial use until around the year 2030. The main downside to using a large cert, such as 3072 or 4096, is that the algorithm is slightly slower (still fractions of a second, though).