Contents
What are the pros to using code repositories?
You can archive all your files in a repository, keeping any other versions or files, even if you aren’t using them at the moment. Code repositories also give you a way to name or tag the different versions, keeping records of changes within the same project.
What is better than GitHub?
1. Bitbucket is more flexible than GitHub. While GitHub comes with a lot of features and allows you to create your own workflows, Bitbucket arguably has more flexibility built-in. Bitbucket can also import from Git, CodePlex, Google Code, SourceForge, and SVN.
Why do you need a single repository for all your code?
For me the single biggest advantages of this sort of organisation style are: It is impossible for your code to get out of sync with itself. Any change can be considered and reviewed as a single atomic unit. Refactoring to modularity becomes cheap.
Why are two Git repositories merged into one repository?
Over time we realized that there was no good reason for this arrangement and was just a general hassle and source of friction, so we decided to combine our two repositories into one repository containing both halves of the code base, with each of the old repositories in its own subdirectory.
What do you mean by repository in source control?
The technology you’re looking for is called Source Control. A repository is a term used by most of the different source control tools to refer to the collection of source code. A source control instance (such as SVN) can have many repositories. Usually a repository contains a project, or a group of projects that are closely related.
Why do repositories not have a save ( ) method?
Another reason your repositories should not have a Save () method is because sometimes as part of a transaction you may work with multiple repositories. And then you want to persist the changes across multiple repositories in one transaction. Here’s an example: Can you see the problem in this code?