What is the best hashing algorithm to use?

What is the best hashing algorithm to use?

Google recommends using stronger hashing algorithms such as SHA-256 and SHA-3. Other options commonly used in practice are bcrypt , scrypt , among many others that you can find in this list of cryptographic algorithms.

Which hash function is better?

The SHA-256 algorithm returns hash value of 256-bits, or 64 hexadecimal digits. While not quite perfect, current research indicates it is considerably more secure than either MD5 or SHA-1. Performance-wise, a SHA-256 hash is about 20-30% slower to calculate than either MD5 or SHA-1 hashes.

What are the advantages of using a hashing algorithm?

Hashing gives a more secure and adjustable method of retrieving data compared to any other data structure. It is quicker than searching for lists and arrays. In the very range, Hashing can recover data in 1.5 probes, anything that is saved in a tree.

Which is the best hashing algorithm for security?

MD5 seems to be a good tradeoff when using cryptographic hash functions, although SHA256 may be more secure to the collision vulnerabilities of MD5 and SHA1. The complexity of all algorithms is linear – which is really not surprising since they work blockwise.

Are there any hash functions that show good distribution?

All the hash functions show good distribution when mapping the table linearly: Except when hashing number strings ( “1”, “2”., “216553”) (for example, zip codes ), where patterns begin to emerge in most of the hashing algorithms: All except FNV-1a, which still look pretty random to me:

Which is the best hash function for string?

If you just want to have a good hash function, and cannot wait, djb2 is one of the best string hash functions i know. It has excellent distribution and speed on many different sets of keys and table sizes

Which is faster SHA256 or SHA512 hashing algorithm?

SHA256 was slower than SHA512. I did not investigate the randomness of the hash functions. But here is a good comparison of the hash functions that are missing in Ian Boyds answer . This points out that CityHash has some problems in corner cases.