Contents
Which is the best form of code review?
One of the most familiar forms of code review is the Github pull request, in which developers leave comments on specific lines of code and, ultimately, approve or reject the proposed changes. Code review is based on the simple assumption that “two heads are better than one”.
Is it worth it to do live code review?
(As a side-note, pair programming can sometimes resemble a form of ‘live’ code review, where one person writes code and the other reviews it on the spot.) Though code review often means code takes a little longer to make it into production, many development teams say that it’s worth the time due to an overall increase in code quality.
Is it OK to do too many code reviews?
Too many checks and logging at multiple layers (UI, Middle tier, Database) would decrease the performance of an application. But few applications, especially relating to finance and banking require multiple checks, audit logging etc. So it is ok to compromise a little on performance to provide enhanced security.
What should be included in a code review checklist?
Let’s first begin with the basic code review checklist and later move on to the detailed code review checklist. Let’s discuss about the basic code review checklist, which can be very handy if you are a beginner in code reviews and/or during initial code reviews.
How many lines of code can you review at a time?
If you try to review too many lines of code at once, you’re less likely to find defects. Try to keep each review session to 400 lines or less. Setting a line-of-code (LOC) limit is important for the same reasons as setting a time limit. It ensures you are at your best when reviewing the code.
Which is the best tool for static code review?
There is a myth that static code analysis tools are only for managers. Use plug-ins such as Resharper, which suggests the best practices in Visual studio. To track the code review comments use the tools like Crucible, Bitbucket and TFS code review process.